YEREVAN -- Armenia's parliament has rejected consideration of a bill seeking to expressly outlaw same-sex marriages in the Caucasus nation.
A majority of lawmakers on November 12 dismissed consideration of a draft law proposed by the opposition Prosperous Armenia Party (BHK), saying it was redundant given that the country's constitution already defines marriage as a union between "a woman and a man."
The bill's co-author, lawmaker Gevork Petrosian, who in the past has expressed anti-LGBT sentiments, demanded that lawmakers "simply put into the Family Code a provision expressly banning same-sex and transgender marriages."
Lawmakers also rejected a proposal by Petrosian to add a provision in the Family Code banning adoption by homosexuals.
The lawmaker described his proposal as a matter of national security and raised a rhetorical question: "Would those voting against this initiative want to see this happen in their families?"
This remark angered parliament speaker Ararat Mirzoian, who asked Petrosian not to "personalize" the issue.
"You are going beyond all limits," Mirzoian said.
Members of the ruling My Step alliance said that Armenia's current legislation regulates all the issues raised by the opposition lawmaker and that there is no need for any additional statements.
"Don't try to be more Catholic than the pope," My Step's Alen Simonian said, suggesting the BHK was using the issue to "create a scandal."
The gay-marriage debate in the Armenian parliament comes amid concerns expressed by conservative groups in Armenia about a possible ratification of a Council of Europe convention that they claim will pave the way for same-sex marriages.
The treaty signed in 2011 and known as the Istanbul Convention commits council member states to combat violence against women.
While saying they support the protection of women, opponents object to the Istanbul Convention's definition of gender as "social roles, behaviors, activities, and characteristics that a particular society considers appropriate for women and men."
They claim this paves the way for introducing transsexual or transgender as separate categories and legalizing gay marriages.
Top clergymen of the Armenian Apostolic Church have also spoken against the ratification of the convention.
Armenian government officials have sought to allay the concerns about the convention by arguing that the convention does not legalize same-sex marriages.
These concerns appear to have forced the authorities in Yerevan to delay ratification until at least next year.
The United Nations, European Union, and local rights groups earlier this year expressed concerns about "hate speech" directed toward Armenia's LGBT community following reports of death threats against a transgender woman who spoke in the country's parliament.
Watchdog
Tuesday 12 November 2019
KYIV -- A Ukrainian appeals court has overturned a lower court's ruling to allow investigators temporary access to editorial communication and other data of journalists working for a joint project of RFE/RL's Ukrainian Service and UA:Pershy television in a case that raised concerns about press freedom in the country.
Judge Olha Yurdyha of the Kyiv Appellate Court ruled on November 12 that the decision by Kyiv's Pechera District Court to allow temporary access to the information must be withdrawn and the investigators' request to obtain such access must be reviewed again by the same court.
Vira Krat, a lawyer representing the Skhemy (Schemes) joint venture, said she was pleased with the ruling.
"I hail the court's decision, because the [the Pechera District Court's] decision is canceled now, and there is no threat of searches of RFE/RL's offices. Our next step is to win the new hearing in the court of the first instance," Krat told RFE/RL.
The Pechera court on October 17 ruled to allow investigators of the State Bureau of Investigations (DBR) to ascertain the work schedules and itineraries of the editorial staff, camera operators, and drivers, their salary information, and internal communications, including information regarding the correction-making and editing process as well as how decisions are made on what content is shown on their investigative programs.
The ruling was related to a DBR criminal investigation of whether former President Petro Poroshenko used "deliberately forged documents" and illegally crossed international borders when he and an unspecified number of people vacationed in the Maldives on January 1-8, 2018, which was the subject of a Skhemy investigation.
The journalism group aired its investigation on January 18, 2018, and in the program it hypothesized that Poroshenko may have used forged documents when traveling.
At a February 28, 2018, news conference, Poroshenko said he crossed the border using his name, "with my own passport that was properly registered with the border guards."
About This Blog
"Watchdog" is a blog with a singular mission -- to monitor the latest developments concerning human rights, civil society, and press freedom. We'll pay particular attention to reports concerning countries in RFE/RL's broadcast region.
Latest Posts
Journalists In Trouble
RFE/RL journalists take risks, face threats, and make sacrifices every day in an effort to gather the news. Our "Journalists In Trouble" page recognizes their courage and conviction, and documents the high price that many have paid simply for doing their jobs. More