Liberal Democratic Party (LDPR) candidate Vladimir Zhirinovsky cut a rug on the campaign trail recently in a video going around.
It's the flamboyant ultranationalist's sixth presidential campaign, so he was actually in that 1996 race in which Boris Yeltsin famously danced that jig on his way to reelection as Russia's president. (Zhirinovsky polled 5.8 percent back then.)
The Russian Service of the BBC conducted on-the-spot interviews with participants in a pro-government rally in Moscow on February 3, most of whom said they were state-sector workers who had been encouraged to come by their employers. When asked whether it was fair that opposition politician Aleksei Navalny and more than 350 of his supporters had been arrested for trying to demonstrate nearby on January 28, most respondents either said they had not heard of those events or said that the arrests were justified because the government had not granted Navalny permission to demonstrate.
Russians Rally To Support Government, Olympic Athletes
By RFE/RL's Russian Service
Tens of thousands of Muscovites have come out for a government-organized concert and demonstration under the slogan "Russia In My Heart."
The February 3 demonstration outside the Kremlin served two purposes: It continued the commemorations of the 75th anniversary of the Soviet victory in the Battle of Stalingrad that began one day earlier and it marked a send-off for Russian athletes heading to the Winter Olympics in Pyeongchang, South Korea.
Police estimated the crowd at about 60,000 people, who stood in wet snow watching large monitors showing Russia's army and navy conducting military operations in Syria overlaid with waving Russian flags to the sound of patriotic anthems.
Some participants expressed resentment that Russian athletes at the Pyeongchang Olympics will have to participate under a neutral flag because Russia has been banned over systemic doping violations by carrying signs reading: "Athletes without a flag are athletes without a motherland."
MORE
What's behind the recent anti-Grudinin campaign in the Russian media?
Pro-Kremlin media have begun attacking Communist candidate Pavel Grudinin more actively. Does the regime really see Grudinin as a threat? Ist it just keeping its "propaganda muscles" in shape? Or is the whole thing just an elaborate spectacle to make the election look more competitive than it really is? In his column for Republic.ru, opposition journalist Oleg Kashin takes a look.
An interesting piece from the opposition-leaning New Times cites sources within Putin's election HQ, suggesting the Putin campaign is being run ultimately by two groups of influence linked to billionaire Yury Kovalchuk, who is sometimes known as Putin's banker, and Sergei Chemezov, the powerful Rostec corporation chief.
Europe's foremost election observer announcing its mission for the March vote will be led by Norwegian Ambassador Jan Petersen:
Here's the key bit of the ODIHR summary of Russia's last presidential election, in 2012:
"Although all contestants were able to campaign unhindered, the conditions for the campaign were found to be skewed in favour of one candidate. While all candidates had access to media, one candidate, the then Prime Minister, was given clear advantage in the coverage. State resources were also mobilized in his support. On election day, observers assessed voting positively, overall; however, the process deteriorated during the count due to procedural irregularities.
"Despite the challenge of organizing elections for nearly 110 million voters residing in a territory comprising nine time zones, the administrative preparations for the presidential election proceeded efficiently. There was, however, a general lack of confidence among many interlocutors in the independence of election officials at all levels, mostly due to their perceived affiliation with local administration and the governing party."
And this is the heart of the ODIHR assessment of the Russian Duma elections in 2016:
"The legal framework can serve as an adequate basis for the conduct of elections, but democratic commitments continue to be challenged and the electoral environment was negatively affected by restrictions to fundamental freedoms and political rights, firmly controlled media and a tightening grip on civil society. The liberalized party registration process has yet to result in distinct political alternatives, and the campaign was low-key. Local authorities did not always treat the contestants equally, and instances of misuse of administrative resources were noted. The election day generally proceeded in an orderly manner, but numerous procedural irregularities were noted during counting."
- By Carl Schreck
'Yeah, I Said It': Communist Lawmaker Blasts Election
Regional television in the Tambov region produced a vox-pop segment interviewing passersby about the election.
The journalists ran into a sitting federal lawmaker, Tamara Pletnyova of the Communist Party, who had some harsh words about Russia's elections: "They won't change anything, and there are no elections. You know all this -- it's nothing but vote rigging. One district head -- not from our region, from another -- said: 'If they tell me to vote for an ape, I'll do it!'"
Pletnyova chairs the committee on families, women, and children in the State Duma.
The news portal Znak.com reached her by telephone to confirm her thoughts on the country's elections. Her response: "Yeah, I said it."
"I can repeat it if you like," Pletnyova added. "You found the video? Then just watch it."
With pollster Levada Center sidelined by the Justice Ministry's "foreign agent" designation (it's still said to be conducting surveys but can't publish or otherwise "participate"), independent polling data will be next-to-impossible to come by.
Last week, state pollster VTsIOM ranked the candidates' public support before filings were confirmed at: Putin 69.9%, Grudinin 7.2%, Zhirinovsky 5.9%, Sobchak 1.2%, Yavlinsky 0.9%, and Titov 0.3%. Baburin and Suraikin weren't accounted for.
- By Carl Schreck
Bad news for any brave souls who bet money that Putin wouldn’t make the ballot.
The Russian president, a shoe-in for reelection, submitted a “record” number of valid signatures as part of a formal bureaucratic step to register as a candidate, a Central Election Commission (CEC) official has said.
Because he’s formally running as an independent, Putin had to submit 300,000 signatures of eligible voters backing his candidacy. The CEC verifies a sampling of those signatures to ensure that no more than 5 percent are invalid. Commission member Nikolai Bulayev said while verifying signatures submitted by Putin, just 0.39 percent were flagged as invalid.
"That's a record-low amount," Bulayev was quoted by the state-run TASS news agency as saying.
Fawning TV coverage of the signature-collection drive for Putin drew criticism from the respected Russian election-monitor Golos, which said it constituted illegal campaigning for a particular candidate.
- By Carl Schreck
Navalny Summoned For Questioning, Accused Of Attacking Police
By RFE/RL
Investigators in Moscow have summoned opposition politician Aleksei Navalny for questioning over what they claim was an assault on the police officers who detained him at a rally late last month.
Navalny wrote on Twitter that police came to his home at 7:30 a.m. local time on February 5 and handed him two subpoenas.
He said he was accused of "hitting the police" who detained him at the protests, one of dozens that Navalny organized nationwide on January 28 to rally in support of his call for a boycott of Russia's upcoming presidential election.
Navalny also wrote on Instagram that the case against him was linked to a video showing the moment he was detained.