Accessibility links

Breaking News

Wider Europe

Tuesday 22 October 2024

 Former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas is expected to become the EU's new foreign policy chief.
Former Estonian Prime Minister Kaja Kallas is expected to become the EU's new foreign policy chief.

Welcome to Wider Europe, RFE/RL's newsletter focusing on the key issues concerning the European Union, NATO, and other institutions and their relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe's Eastern neighborhoods.

I'm RFE/RL Europe Editor Rikard Jozwiak, and this week I am previewing the upcoming hearings in the European Parliament, where the commissioner candidates have to prove their worth.

Note to Readers: You can now listen to my briefings by clicking on the audio link below. We're actually using an AI version of my voice and would love to know what you think -- and, of course, what we can improve. Happy listening!

please wait

No media source currently available

0:00 0:11:55 0:00

Briefing #1: Will Kaja Kallas Tone It Down?

What You Need To Know: While most of the world will likely be focusing on the U.S. presidential election and its aftermath, EU-types will be glued to something completely different: the hearings of the 26 commissioners-designate from November 4 to November 12.

Each candidate will face three hours of grilling from members of the European Parliament (MEPs) in a committee relevant to their assigned portfolio. Last time around, in 2019, three candidates were culled, so expect that this could happen again, leading to extra hearings later in the month.

One commissioner-designate who is expected to sail through, however, is the prospective EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas. The former Estonian prime minister is considered one of the "stars" of European Commission President Ursula Von der Leyen's new team.

What will be interesting at her November 12 hearing is to see how much (if at all) she tones down her hawkish rhetoric on China and Russia in order to fit the new post, where diplomacy and finding consensus on foreign policy issues is of paramount importance.

Deep Background: Judging from von der Leyen's mission letter to Kallas, the focus of much of the questioning will be on Ukraine. The mission letter, which is a public document outlining what the president expects from a commissioner over the next five years, essentially makes it clear from the very start: "We will work closely together to ensure that Europe stands with Ukraine for as long as it takes -- economically, politically, and militarily -- and supports its territorial integrity."

Can Kallas offer something new here? Kyiv is already expected to open EU accession chapters next year and EU financial support for the country for 2025 is already secured. So far, the EU has imposed 14 rounds of sanctions on Russia, but, from speaking to diplomats around Brussels, it is becoming increasingly hard to persuade EU member states to adopt more hard-hitting measures on Moscow with Europe's economic climate and outlook far from rosy.

So it will be interesting to see if Kallas takes a harder line, for example by preventing the circumvention of sanctions by adding third-country companies or even third countries on the bloc's blacklist. While the EU already has mechanisms in place to do this, so far the lists have remained empty.

If approved (and really it is a case of when rather than if), the former Estonian prime minister is likely to present a new sanctions regime targeting hybrid threats to the EU. A new regime dealing with Russian subversive actions toward the bloc was recently enacted, but Kallas is expected to push for a global mechanism.

Many MEPs will certainly push Kallas to include corruption as a sanctionable offense in the EU's "Magnitsky Act," which sets out sanctions for human rights violators in Russia. That's something that has eluded previous EU foreign policy chiefs, and those pushing such a measure hope it would mean leveraging Russian frozen assets in the EU to pay for the reconstruction of Ukraine. Both moves require unanimity, and it will be Kallas's job to get that done.

Drilling Down:

  • Both von der Leyen and the European Parliament will want Kallas to try to get more EU foreign policy decisions to be taken via qualified majority voting (55 percent of EU member states covering 65 percent of the total EU population voting in favor) to circumvent national vetoes. For a long time, this has been top of the EU's wish list, as it would allow the bloc to be nimbler in world affairs. Quite a few national capitals, however, are reluctant to give up their foreign policy prerogatives, and you need unanimity to get rid of the unanimity.
  • Perhaps the most curious aspect of von der Leyen's mission letter is that it doesn't mention the Western Balkans or China. Still, the MEPs will surely question her on both.
  • I have a hunch that she might announce at the hearing that her first trip as commissioner would be a visit to the Western Balkans. On this, she will certainly be quizzed on how she intends to resuscitate the EU-mediated Belgrade-Pristina dialogue.
  • Her predecessors, Federica Mogherini and Josep Borrell, didn't accomplish much in Serbia-Kosovo relations over the last 10 years. Will she have a more hands-on approach with regular meetings with the two countries' leaders, or will she delegate the talks to a special representative, as Borrell did?
  • The EU recently announced tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and Kallas will likely be asked if she has more sectors in her crosshairs. She will also be pressed on whether she will go after China if Beijing continues to help the Kremlin's war efforts in Ukraine.
  • With the hearing coming a week after the U.S. election, there will also be questions about future relations with Washington, especially if the more isolationist Donald Trump returns to the White House.
  • Kallas, according to people who know her, is an ardent transatlanticist, but she will be asked about the need for the EU to develop some sort of "strategic autonomy" -- a concept that many in the eastern part of the bloc have seen as a French plan to diminish U.S. influence and elevate its own.
  • One of her key tasks, together with the newly created portfolio of defense (given to the former Lithuanian Prime Minister Andrius Kubilius), will be to compose a white paper on the future of European defense in the first 100 days of her mandate.
  • As always, the million-dollar question will be how much money should be given to build up a European defense industry -- plus, whether the EU will work with non-EU defense contractors.
  • And then there is, of course, the crisis in the Middle East. With member states divided on Israel, it's clear that the EU doesn't have much desire to shape the situation right now. But once the dust settles, there are calls for a robust plan. As her mission letter states: "You will take forward a comprehensive EU Middle East Strategy with a view to the day after the war in Gaza, focusing on promoting all the steps needed for the two-state solution and strengthening partnerships with key regional stakeholders."

Briefing #2: Marta Kos's Turn In The Hot Seat

What You Need To Know: While Kallas is expected to breeze through the questioning, the Slovenian commissioner-designate for enlargement, Marta Kos, is likely to face a stormier hearing on November 7. From speaking to sources in the European Parliament, it's thought that she is one of the candidates who could be voted down.

For starters, she is left-leaning in a chamber that is increasingly tilting right. Then there's the comments she made a month after Moscow's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, when she noted that doors must not be closed toward Russia. There are also allegations of links to the former Yugoslav secret police, which she has denied, and complaints from former employees about her management when she served as Slovenia's ambassador to Germany.

While most of the questions will likely focus on how she ensures that EU hopefuls in both the Western Balkans (Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Serbia) and in the east (Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine) move toward membership, there are plenty of other things for MEPs to sink their teeth into.

Deep Background: A key question is whether Kos will commit to any dates for future enlargement during her term, which ends in 2029. For example, Montenegro wants to be a member by 2028, but does she think that is feasible? Moldova and Ukraine aim to be part of the bloc by 2030, but does she think that's reasonable?

To be sure, enlargement timelines are complicated and not solely her call. She is a guide not a decision-maker. And the fact remains that no country has joined the EU since Croatia back in 2013, and every current member state can veto any opening and closing of EU accession chapters.

Moreover, von der Leyen's mission letter to Kos also doesn't commit. The letter just states that "you will work on gradual integration of candidate countries as they work to join the [European] Union."

Drilling Down:

  • Even though, if approved, she may not see any new countries joining under her watch, Kos is likely to see quite a few of them advancing. Already in the first half of 2025, Moldova and Ukraine are expected to open the first EU accession chapters, de facto starting the negotiation process.
  • While so far there seems to be little resistance in the bloc to Moldova joining, it will be interesting to see how Kos will deal with the member states, notably Hungary and possibly also Slovakia, that have expressed reservations about Ukraine's potential membership. Will she, for example, be in favor of decoupling Ukraine's and Moldova's candidacies?
  • While Bosnia-Herzegovina is hoping to start opening chapters, conditions need to be met by Sarajevo, including stepping up the fight against organized crime and corruption.
  • It might be that Kos would be the one to drag Montenegro over the finish line or at least get the country most of the way. Podgorica has opened negotiations on all 33 policy accession chapters but has only managed to conclude talks on three of them. At this point, Montenegro is closest to become EU member 28 and there is a feeling among pro-enlargement diplomats and politicians in Brussels that the bloc must show to other prospective members that enlargement is indeed possible.
  • It won't be smooth sailing. While Albania just recently opened chapters and is making good progress, Serbia's accession could continue to be thwarted by Russia hawks in the EU's eastern members objecting to Belgrade's close links to Moscow.
  • North Macedonia's newish center-right government is unlikely to meet Bulgarian demands that it change the country's constitution in order to open up the path for Skopje to start talks. North Macedonia's government has also referred to the country as just "Macedonia," irritating its southern neighbor Greece, which for decades was embroiled in fights with Skopje over the name issue. Finding ways for North Macedonia to have better neighborly relations with both Bulgaria and Greece will be an issue Kos will certainly be grilled on by MEPs. If she does get the job, she will spend a lot of time dealing with these delicate matters.
  • Kosovo's EU membership application is stuck in the European Council, where EU members sit, as nonrecognizers of Pristina such as Spain aren't keen to send the application for an assessment across the street to the European Commission. Most likely, Kos will say that she is ready to sign off on the assessment but that it's ultimately out of her hands.
  • And then there is Georgia, which has had its EU aspirations come to a halt over several controversial laws adopted by the current government. Kos's hearing will take place after key parliamentary elections in Georgia on October 26, so definitely expect some questions there. Georgia is actually not mentioned by name in the mission letter, which just says that "you should also develop a coordinated approach to supporting the countries of the Southern Caucasus, including on regional connectivity." Perhaps I'm reading too much into it, but to lump Georgia in with Azerbaijan, an undemocratic state with no interest in joining the EU, and Armenia, which might be interested in joining but is reluctant to apply for fear of upsetting Moscow, seems to be already something of a snub.

Looking Ahead

There is another plenary of the European Parliament in Strasbourg this week. Look out for the debate and vote today (October 22) on the EU's next round of financial aid for Ukraine. The lawmakers are set to approve the 35 billion-euro ($38 billion) package after EU member states gave their consent earlier in October.

That's all for this week! Feel free to reach out to me on any of these issues on X @RikardJozwiak, or on e-mail at jozwiakr@rferl.org.

I will be off next week, so the new issue of the newsletter will come on November 5.

Until next time,

Rikard Jozwiak

If you enjoyed this briefing and don't want to miss the next edition subscribe here.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy (right) and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen greet each other in Kyiv on September 20.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy (right) and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen greet each other in Kyiv on September 20.

Welcome to Wider Europe, RFE/RL's newsletter focusing on the key issues concerning the European Union, NATO, and other institutions and their relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe's Eastern neighborhoods.

I'm RFE/RL Europe Editor Rikard Jozwiak, and this week I am previewing two big meetings: Mark Rutte's first NATO ministerial and an EU summit that will be dominated by migration.

NOTE TO READERS: As we are celebrating the second anniversary of the Wider Europe newsletter this week, we have added a new feature: You can now listen to my briefings by clicking on the button below! We're actually using an AI version of my voice and would love to know what you think -- and, of course, what we can improve.

please wait

No media source currently available

0:00 0:12:37 0:00

Briefing #1: Migration Issues To Dominate This Week's EU Summit

What You Need To Know: EU leaders gather in Brussels on October 17-18 for their regular fall summit -- a dress rehearsal ahead of the often more dramatic pre-Christmas summit in December when real decisions are taken on enlargement, funding, or sanctions before the holiday season kicks in.

This week's meeting is also the last one before the U.S. presidential election in November, as well as a presidential election and referendum on EU membership in Moldova on October 20 and then the Georgian parliamentary vote six days after that.

In Brussels, discussions about Ukraine will be central although few decisions are expected. The hot-button issue is expected to be the migration debate, which may have consequences for several countries hoping to one day join the bloc.

Deep Background: The draft summit conclusions, seen by RFE/RL, offer little that's new on Ukraine. Amid vague talk of some kind of "peace summit" to be held by the end of the year, potentially including participation on some level by Russia, the conclusions text simply states that "the European Council also stresses that no initiative about Ukraine can be taken without Ukraine."

The draft document indicates that no new sanctions on Russia appear to be forthcoming and instead leaders, at the end of the summit, will emphasize the need for "full and effective enforcement of sanctions and for further measures to counter their circumvention, including through third countries."

On economic aid, EU ambassadors last week agreed on another 35 billion euros ($38.2 million) in financial assistance for Kyiv for 2025, leveraged from frozen Russian central bank assets in the EU.

The EU has, however, not agreed on prolonging the sanctions on these central bank assets from the current six months rollover to the proposed 36 months extension. That extension would allow other G7 nations to provide funds as well, as they want guarantees that the Russian money, which is mainly in the EU, remains frozen for a longer period of time. Hungary is currently blocking the extension, and a decision on this issue from Brussels likely wouldn't come until after the U.S. presidential election.

On the upcoming Moldovan votes, the summit draft conclusions call out the Kremlin's attempts to influence the process, noting that "persistent attempts to use foreign information manipulation and interference to undermine democratic elections and the choice of the Moldovan people for a prosperous, stable, and peaceful European future."

While not openly taking sides, it is clear Brussels is hoping for Moldovans to vote for the EU in both the referendum and the presidential vote. Just last week, the EU slapped asset freezes and visa bans on five people, including Evghenia Gutul, the pro-Moscow governor of the Moldovan autonomous Gagauzia region. It also sanctioned Evrazia, a Russian-based NGO founded to promote Russian interests in Moldova.

In addition, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen traveled to Chisinau, the Moldovan capital, and presented a financial package for the country worth 1.8 billion euros for the next three years.

Drilling Down

  • For Georgia, the mood is decidedly more somber. The text notes "serious concern regarding the course of action in Georgia, which runs contrary to the values and principles upon which the European Union is founded" and adds that recent developments in Georgia jeopardize the country's EU path and "de facto halts the accession process."
  • The recent adoption of the so-called foreign agent law and anti-LGBT law have prompted the EU to cancel high-level political visits to Tbilisi and withhold some EU money going to the South Caucasus country. Brussels hasn't ruled out that more measures could be adopted in the future if Georgia further backslides on democracy.
  • Perhaps the most intense discussion at this week's two-day summit is likely to center around migration. The most controversial line in the draft conclusions is about the "new ways to prevent and counter irregular migration...in line with international law." This is something of a continuation of a letter written by 15 EU member states to the European Commission back in June, which mainly focuses on the need for various migration partnerships with non-EU countries. That could mean paying countries like Tunisia and Turkey to prevent migrants from reaching the bloc in the first place or looking into schemes, such as one under way between Italy and Albania, where Rome will build reception camps in Albania to house up to 40,000 migrants a year picked up at sea.
  • The idea of creating these types of "external hot spots" outside the EU in which people get their asylum claims tested before they may enter the EU is gaining ground. There is also the broader issue of returning people that have no legal right to stay in the bloc.
  • Hardened attitudes on migration come weeks after Germany decided to impose checks on all its borders in the wake of an attack where a failed asylum seeker killed three people in the west of the country during the summer.
  • It also comes as anti-immigration parties have finished top in Austria's parliamentary elections on September 29 and done well in recent polls in the Czech Republic and Germany. It's also worth noting that the recently formed French government is dependent on Marine Le Pen's far-right National Rally for survival and that similar political forces are heading or influencing governments in other key EU member states such as Italy, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Essentially, there is just a diminishing number of countries, most notably Spain, that are reluctant to adopt a more restrictive EU migration policy.
  • While the EU summit won't go into any detail about other countries that could play a similar role in hosting migrants as that of Albania, it's possible other EU candidate countries, for example in the Western Balkans, could be asked.
  • The new European Commission, which should be up and running by the end of the year, will be tasked with looking into such solutions to the migrants issue in the future. In a letter from Ursula von der Leyen to the commissioner designate for home affairs, the Austrian conservative Magnus Brunner, the European Commission president, writes that "you will steer innovative operational solutions to counter irregular migration."

Briefing #2: Mark Rutte's First Big NATO Meeting

What You Need To Know: NATO's defense ministers (and possibly a few leaders) will meet on October 17-18 in what will be new Secretary-General Mark Rutte's first proper meeting as the head of the organization. It's also the first time the defense ministers of the military alliance's four "Indo-Pacific partners" -- Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea -- join for a session with their 32 NATO counterparts.

It does signal the push, largely from the United States, to focus more on the growing influence and threats posed by China. While Beijing isn't officially branded as an "adversary" by NATO, the military alliance is open about how Beijing is challenging Euro-Atlantic interests, security, and values -- hence the apparent need to step up operations, including joint arms production and training, with the four states.

In the same spirit, NATO allies will want the Indo-Pacific quartet to intensify their support for Ukraine. This is especially true of South Korea, which is a big producer of ammunition needed on the battlefield. Korean arms manufacturers are providing some of this ammunition to NATO allies, who then often pass it on to Kyiv. Seoul is treading carefully here, though, wary about drawing too much attention from neighbouring North Korea and China.

Deep Background: In the second of three ministerial sessions, Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov will join to brief the participants about the war effort. He will also most likely plead for more military aid, notably air defense and long-range missiles.

NATO will want to communicate at the meeting that the alliance has come a long way in meeting its goal set at the Washington summit in July of providing Ukraine with 40 billion euros ($43.7 billion) of funds in 2025. Otherwise there likely won't be too much good news on Ukraine.

The situation on the front lines "remains discouraging," as one NATO source told me, and Kyiv isn't experiencing much luck politically either. During his trip to the United States in September, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy didn't get what he wanted in terms of allowing Kyiv to use Western weapons to strike targets deep inside Russia -- or even hints that an invitation for Ukraine to join NATO was forthcoming.

And last week, Zelenskiy's meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden and other leaders at the German military base of Ramstein was canceled due to Hurricane Milton hitting Florida.

The Ramstein meeting, which brings together over 50 nations that support Kyiv militarily, was widely seen by diplomats as the last chance for Ukraine to push for these two key goals before the U.S. election on November 5. The chance of getting a NATO invitation during Biden's remaining time in office is likely very slim, whereas there's probably a greater chance of getting a green light to strike Russian military targets outside Ukraine.

It is possible, however, that a Ramstein meeting could still take place at a ministerial level, possibly even on the sidelines of this week's NATO defense meeting.

Drilling Down

  • The third and final session of the ministerial is about NATO's own deterrence and defense. And it could prove to be the trickiest one. There will be talk about how to respond to the increased number of Russian airspace violations in NATO frontline states such as the Baltic states, Poland, and Romania.
  • Don't expect any joint agreement on this, and countries will be free to defend their airspace as they see fit -- but there will be a sense of caution in not escalating the situation with Moscow too much.
  • Another contentious issue is the pre-positioning of defense equipment in NATO member states close to Russia. This places heavier weapons and ammunition closer to NATO borders to increase readiness in case of an attack. NATO has pushed pre-positioning for over a decade, even though there is a distinct lack of equipment.
  • In fact, it is only the United States that has enough heavy weapons and ammunition to place in depots in various frontline states. West European allies have been criticized for underspending on defense in recent decades, claiming they have sent all their spare equipment to Ukraine or have just been reluctant to share more of what they have.
  • The plan now is to determine how much burden frontline states should bear in preparing for an eventual attack, as well as how much other NATO nations, which comprise the eight multinational battlegroups stationed in Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia, should bring to the host nations' military depots.
  • And then you can expect politicking to happen at the sidelines in terms of who should become Rutte's righthand person. The deadline for applications for the deputy secretary-general position closes on the final day of the ministerial meeting (October 18), and, in November, the successful candidate should be revealed. The former defense minister of North Macedonia, Radmila Sekerinska, and the former foreign minister of Bulgaria, Mariya Gabriel, are the early favorites, but don't rule out that there are other candidates under consideration as well.

Looking Ahead

EU energy ministers are gathering in Luxembourg on October 15 and they will be joined by their Ukrainian counterpart, German Galushchenko, who will brief them about how his war-torn country is preparing for the winter ahead. The Russian military has continued to target Ukraine's energy infrastructure throughout the summer and fall.

On the same day and in the same city, there will at least be some joy for Albania as Tirana will officially open its first EU accession chapters. A so-called intergovernmental conference will be held to mark the occasion under the auspices of the ongoing Hungarian presidency of the Council of the European Union.

That's all for this week! Feel free to reach out to me on any of these issues on Twitter @RikardJozwiak, or on e-mail at jozwiakr@rferl.org.

Until next time,

Rikard Jozwiak

If you enjoyed this briefing and don't want to miss the next edition subscribe here.

Load more

About The Newsletter

The Wider Europe newsletter briefs you every Tuesday morning on key issues concerning the EU, NATO, and other institutions’ relationships with the Western Balkans and Europe’s Eastern neighborhoods.

For more than a decade as a correspondent in Brussels, Rikard Jozwiak covered all the major events and crises related to the EU’s neighborhood and how various Western institutions reacted to them -- the war in Georgia, the annexation of Crimea, Russia’s support for separatists in eastern Ukraine, the downing of MH17, dialogue between Serbia and Kosovo, the EU and NATO enlargement processes in the Western Balkans, as well as visa liberalizations, free-trade deals, and countless summits.

Now out of the “Brussels bubble,” but still looking in -- this time from the heart of Europe, in Prague -- he continues to focus on the countries where Brussels holds huge sway, but also faces serious competition from other players, such as Russia and, increasingly, China.

To subscribe, click here.

RFE/RL has been declared an "undesirable organization" by the Russian government.

If you are in Russia or the Russia-controlled parts of Ukraine and hold a Russian passport or are a stateless person residing permanently in Russia or the Russia-controlled parts of Ukraine, please note that you could face fines or imprisonment for sharing, liking, commenting on, or saving our content, or for contacting us.

To find out more, click here.

XS
SM
MD
LG